Marcelin v. Evans

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Marcelin v. Evans

108 A.D.3d 979, 968 N.Y.S.2d 816

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 18, 2013·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

— Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Elliot, J.), entered December 14, 2012 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination of the Board of Parole rendered in May 2011 which denied his request for parole release and ordered his next appearance in 24 months. The Attorney General has advised this Court that petitioner reappeared before the Board on June 4, 2013 and his request for parole release was again denied. In view of this, the appeal is now moot and must be dismissed (see Matter of Lopez v Evans, 102 AD3d 1029, 1030 [2013]). Contrary to petitioner’s argument, he has not demonstrated that the exception to the mootness doctrine applies (see Matter of Hodge v Evans, 102 AD3d 1049 [2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 852 [2013]).

Peters, P.J., Stein, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Elliot, J.), entered December 14, 2012 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination of the Board of Parole rendered in May 2011 which denied his request for parole release and ordered his next appearance in 24 months. The Attorney General has advised this Court that petitioner reappeared before the Board on June 4, 2013 and his request for parole release was again denied. In view of this, the appeal is now moot and must be dismissed (see Matter of Lopez v Evans, 102 AD3d 1029, 1030 [2013]). Contrary to petitioner’s argument, he has not demonstrated that the exception to the mootness doctrine applies (see Matter of Hodge v Evans, 102 AD3d 1049 [2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 852 [2013]).

Peters, P.J., Stein, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Marcelin v. Evans, 108 A.D.3d 979, 968 N.Y.S.2d 816 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

108 A.D.3d 979 (Marcelin v. Evans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related