Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Marceca v. Southeast Bank, N.A.

Marceca v. Southeast Bank, N.A.

521 So. 2d 156, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 345, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 378, 1988 WL 6069
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 3, 1988
DocketNos. 87-0480, 87-0508
StatusPublished

This text of 521 So. 2d 156 (Marceca v. Southeast Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marceca v. Southeast Bank, N.A., 521 So. 2d 156, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 345, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 378, 1988 WL 6069 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s refusal to set aside a default because the record supports the trial court’s conclusion that the defaulted party’s out-of-state attorney either intentionally or through gross neglect ignored the necessity to respond in court to the summons and complaint served upon the appellant and delivered to his attorney. See Somero v. Hendry General Hospital, 467 So.2d 1103, 1105 (Fla. 4th DCA), petition for review denied, 476 So.2d 674 (Fla.1985).

ANSTEAD, J., and SALMON, MICHAEL H., Associate Judge, concur. GLICKSTEIN, J., concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Somero v. Hendry General Hosp.
467 So. 2d 1103 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
521 So. 2d 156, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 345, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 378, 1988 WL 6069, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marceca-v-southeast-bank-na-fladistctapp-1988.