Marceau v. Rutland Railroad

138 N.Y.S. 1128
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 13, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 138 N.Y.S. 1128 (Marceau v. Rutland Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marceau v. Rutland Railroad, 138 N.Y.S. 1128 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment (74 Misc. Rep. 635, 134 N. Y. Supp. 594) and order affirmed, with costs.

SMITH, P. J., and HOUGHTON, J., dissent, on the ground that the court erred in applying the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Central R. v. Peluso
286 F. 661 (Second Circuit, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 N.Y.S. 1128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marceau-v-rutland-railroad-nyappdiv-1912.