Marc Sultana v. Endeavor Air Corporation

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 16, 2024
Docket23-3369
StatusUnpublished

This text of Marc Sultana v. Endeavor Air Corporation (Marc Sultana v. Endeavor Air Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Marc Sultana v. Endeavor Air Corporation, (8th Cir. 2024).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 23-3369 ___________________________

Marc Saeed Sultana

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Tom Wychor, Individual

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant

Endeavor Air Corporation

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________

Submitted: August 13, 2024 Filed: August 16, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________

Before SHEPHERD, KELLY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM. Marc Saeed Sultana appeals the district court’s1 with-prejudice dismissal of his employment discrimination action for failure to prosecute and to follow court orders. He also moves for reconsideration of the clerk’s order striking his overlength reply brief. Following a careful review, we conclude the district court did not err in dismissing the case with prejudice. See Smith v. Gold Dust Casino, 526 F.3d 402, 404 (8th Cir. 2008) (reviewing dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for abuse of discretion); Keefer v. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co., 238 F.3d 937, 940-41 (8th Cir. 2000) (reviewing award of sanctions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 for abuse of discretion); Rodgers v. Curators of Univ. of Mo., 135 F.3d 1216, 1219 (8th Cir. 1998) (reviewing for clear error district court’s factual findings that party willfully disregarded court orders and prejudiced movant); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f) (district court may dismiss action with prejudice for failure to obey scheduling or pretrial order and must order payment of expenses).

Accordingly, we deny the pending motion and affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Jerry W. Blackwell, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Tony N. Leung, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Gold Dust Casino
526 F.3d 402 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Marc Sultana v. Endeavor Air Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marc-sultana-v-endeavor-air-corporation-ca8-2024.