Marc M. Dulcio v. Idline Etienne
This text of Marc M. Dulcio v. Idline Etienne (Marc M. Dulcio v. Idline Etienne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
MARC M. DULCIO, Appellant,
v.
IDLINE ETIENNE, and U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee of BKPL-EG BASKET TRUST, Appellees.
Nos. 4D2024-1654 and 4D2024-1943
[March 26, 2025]
Consolidated appeals of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Reid P. Scott, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502023CA015898XXX.
Marc M. Dulcio, Greenacres, pro se.
Evan R. Raymond of Howard Law, Boca Raton, for appellee U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee of BKPL-EG Basket Trust.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order denying appellant’s motion to quash service of process. Appellant has failed to provide an adequate record to show error. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979). The order denying appellant’s motion to dismiss, which is the subject of the consolidated appeal, is not subject to interlocutory review. See Campbell v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 204 So. 3d 476, 480 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).
Affirmed.
WARNER, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Marc M. Dulcio v. Idline Etienne, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marc-m-dulcio-v-idline-etienne-fladistctapp-2025.