Marc Healey v. Natasha Hall and Royce Hall, III, D/B/A No Limit Retrievers

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 4, 2016·No. 05-16-00598-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered October 4, 2016

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-00598-CV

MARC HEALEY, Appellant

V.

NATASHA HALL, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 92099-CC2

ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s September 28, 2016 motion to compel the court reporter

to file the reporter’s record. On July 13, 2016, the Court ordered this appeal submitted without

the reporter’s record after appellant failed to provide proof of request for the reporter’s record

and written verification that he had paid the court reporter’s fee or been found entitled to proceed

without advance payment of costs. To date, appellant has not provided proof of payment of the

court reporter’s fee. Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s motion. Appellant’s brief on the merits

is due OCTOBER 11, 2016.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marc Healey v. Natasha Hall and Royce Hall, III, D/B/A No Limit Retrievers, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Marc Healey v. Natasha Hall and Royce Hall, III, D/B/A No Limit Retrievers (Marc Healey v. Natasha Hall and Royce Hall, III, D/B/A No Limit Retrievers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.