Marble v. Marble

5 N.H. 374
Superior Court of New Hampshire·Decided April 15, 1831·Published

Opinion

By the Court.

We are all of opinion, that, the evidence in this case was properly rejected. It was clearly a contract for the sale of land, and not being in writing, no action can be maintained upon it. 2 Starkies, 598—601 ; 5 B. & C. 829, Evans v. Roberts; 5 Cowen, 162, Van Alstine v. Wimple; Newland 182; 3 Vesey, 38, note; 2 Starkies, N. P. C. 379, Thompson v. Wilson; 7 Taunton, 157, Hoby v. Roebuck; 2 Taunton, 38, Emerson v. Heelis; 6 Cowen, 445, Gale v. Nixon.

Judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marble v. Marble, 5 N.H. 374 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1831).

5 N.H. 374 (Marble v. Marble) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.