Marangine v. Lydle
This text of 26 A.D.2d 895 (Marangine v. Lydle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgments unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event. Memorandum: The verdict in favor of defendant Addison is against the weight of evidence. The verdicts in favor of plaintiffs are inadequate. (Appeal from judgment of Niagara Trial Term in favor of defendant Jake C. Addison, Jr. for no cause of action in an automobile negligence action; also appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiffs against defendants Lydle.) Present—Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry and Del Vecchio, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 A.D.2d 895, 274 N.Y.S.2d 857, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marangine-v-lydle-nyappdiv-1966.