Marandino v. Prometheus Pharmacy
945 A.2d 977, 286 Conn. 917
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedApril 2, 2008
DocketSC 18135X01
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 945 A.2d 977 (Marandino v. Prometheus Pharmacy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Marandino v. Prometheus Pharmacy, 945 A.2d 977, 286 Conn. 917 (Colo. 2008).
Opinion
The plaintiffs cross petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 105 Conn. App. 669 (AC 28146), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the workers’ compensation commissioner improperly relied on the report by Vincent Santoro, an orthopedic surgeon?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Marandino v. Prometheus Pharmacy
986 A.2d 1023 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
945 A.2d 977, 286 Conn. 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/marandino-v-prometheus-pharmacy-conn-2008.