Maran v. Maran

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Maran v. Maran

384 So. 2d 950, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16422

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 18, 1980

DocketNo. 79-232

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 384 So. 2d 950 (Maran v. Maran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maran v. Maran, 384 So. 2d 950, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16422 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

ANSTEAD, Judge.

The wife is here appealing the trial court’s decision awarding custody of the parties’ 15 month old child to the husband. We affirm.

The main contention of the wife is that she should have been awarded custody because the child is of tender years; and in such case, other essential factors being equal, the mother should have custody. Dinkel v. Dinkel, 322 So.2d 22 (Fla.1975). In deciding the issue of custody a trial court is required to determine what custody arrangement would be in the best interests of the child. The age of the child, although important, is but one of the factors to be considered. In this case, we believe the trial court properly concluded that the other essential factors were not equal and therefore that the evidence supported an award of custody to the husband, rather than the wife, as being in the best interests of the child. Marshall v. Marshall, 375 So.2d 1082 1st DCA 1979).

Accordingly, the final judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed,

GLICKSTEIN and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ANSTEAD, Judge.

The wife is here appealing the trial court’s decision awarding custody of the parties’ 15 month old child to the husband. We affirm.

The main contention of the wife is that she should have been awarded custody because the child is of tender years; and in such case, other essential factors being equal, the mother should have custody. Dinkel v. Dinkel, 322 So.2d 22 (Fla.1975). In deciding the issue of custody a trial court is required to determine what custody arrangement would be in the best interests of the child. The age of the child, although important, is but one of the factors to be considered. In this case, we believe the trial court properly concluded that the other essential factors were not equal and therefore that the evidence supported an award of custody to the husband, rather than the wife, as being in the best interests of the child. Marshall v. Marshall, 375 So.2d 1082 1st DCA 1979).

Accordingly, the final judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed,

GLICKSTEIN and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

384 So. 2d 950, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maran-v-maran-fladistctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack