Marak Sales Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Marak Sales Co. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 491

United States Customs Court·Decided November 13, 1957·No. No. 61345; protest 264611-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that the importing vessel did, in fact, leave Mexico on April 19, 1954. In view of the stipulation and following Abstract 47519, United States v. Abell Forwarding Co., Inc., 73 Treas. Dec. 1426, Reap. Dec. 4248, and Forman v. Peaslee, 9 Fed. Cas. 452, it was held that the rate of exchange in effect on the date of exportation, April 19, 1954, should have been used to convert the Mexican currency to American dollars in liquidating the involved entries. ( Accordingly, the protest was sustained, and the collector was directed to reliquidate the entries and make refund accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that the importing vessel did, in fact, leave Mexico on April 19, 1954. In view of the stipulation and following Abstract 47519, United States v. Abell Forwarding Co., Inc., 73 Treas. Dec. 1426, Reap. Dec. 4248, and Forman v. Peaslee, 9 Fed. Cas. 452, it was held that the rate of exchange in effect on the date of exportation, April 19, 1954, should have been used to convert the Mexican currency to American dollars in liquidating the involved entries. ( Accordingly, the protest was sustained, and the collector was directed to reliquidate the entries and make refund accordingly.

Marak Sales Co. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 491 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

39 Cust. Ct. 491 (Marak Sales Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related