Maradiaga v. Wilson

272 F. App'x 263
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 7, 2008·No. No. 07-7556·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eric Maradiaga appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting summary judgment to the Defendants, and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Maradiaga v. Wilson, 518 F.Supp.2d 760 (D.S.C.2007). We also deny the motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maradiaga v. Wilson, 272 F. App'x 263 (4th Cir. 2008).

272 F. App'x 263 (Maradiaga v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lee v. City of Richmond
100 F. Supp. 3d 528 (E.D. Virginia, 2015)