Marabella v. Lundy

New York Court of Appeals

Marabella v. Lundy

454 N.E.2d 122, 60 N.Y.2d 581, 467 N.Y.S.2d 41, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3299

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 12, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 454 N.E.2d 122 (Marabella v. Lundy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Marabella v. Lundy, 454 N.E.2d 122, 60 N.Y.2d 581, 467 N.Y.S.2d 41, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3299 (N.Y. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with cost.

We need not consider the recent amendments to the CPLR allowing the lower courts to exercise discretion “to excuse delay or default resulting from law office failure” (CPLR 2005, 3012, subd [d]), for we agree with the Appellate Division that plaintiff’s papers failed to establish the merit of the cause of action as required by 22 NYCRR 675.5 (b).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI