Mar v. MHZ Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mar v. MHZ Realty Corp.

205 A.D.2d 667, 614 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6438

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 205 A.D.2d 667 (Mar v. MHZ Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mar v. MHZ Realty Corp., 205 A.D.2d 667, 614 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6438 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Smith, J.), dated January 6, 1993, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to transfer the [668]*668venue of the action from Queens County to Ulster County pursuant to CPLR 510 (3).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant met its burden of demonstrating that the convenience of material witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change of venue to Ulster County (see, CPLR 510 [3]) where the action arose (see, Jansen v Bernhang, 149 AD2d 468). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Smith, J.), dated January 6, 1993, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to transfer the [668]*668venue of the action from Queens County to Ulster County pursuant to CPLR 510 (3).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant met its burden of demonstrating that the convenience of material witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change of venue to Ulster County (see, CPLR 510 [3]) where the action arose (see, Jansen v Bernhang, 149 AD2d 468). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 667, 614 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mar-v-mhz-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack