Mar-Nique Simon v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California

District Court, N.D. California·Decided November 18, 2025·No. 3:09-cv-05859·Unknown

Opinion

Attorney General of California Deputy Attorney General Supervising Deputy Attorney General State Bar No. 191193 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 510-3866 Fax: (415) 703-1234 E-mail: Michele.Swanson@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Respondent

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION MAR-NIQUE SIMON, C 09-05859 WHA (PR) Petitioner, JOINT STATEMENT, STIPULATION, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER v. REGARDING THIS COURT’S CONTINUING JURISDICTION OVER FEDERAL HABEAS PETITION AND DOMINGO URIBE,1 Warden, RETRACTION OF MOTION TO Respondent.

On November 13, 2025, this Court held a hearing with counsel for both parties concerning a motion to withdraw as counsel filed by petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Tamor. Later that day, the Court issued an order setting forth certain triggering dates and tasks for counsel depending on Mr. Tamor’s decision as to whether it would be proper for him to remain as counsel for petitioner. Dkt. No. 217. The parties have met and conferred, and Mr. Tamor has indicated that he decided it would be proper for him to remain as counsel for petitioner. The parties therefore agree and stipulate to the following:

1 Petitioner is currently incarcerated at California State Prison, Sacramento, and is in the custody of Warden Jason Schultz. We therefore request that Warden Schultz be substituted for Warden Uribe as the respondent in this case. 1. On December 11, 2003, petitioner pleaded no contest to charges of attempted murder and second degree robbery, and admitted firearm and great bodily injury enhancements, in Alameda County Superior Court case number 145604. On March 1, 2004, the trial court sentenced petitioner to twenty years in state prison. 2. On December 15, 2009, petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in this action challenging his state judgment in case number 145604. At the time petitioner filed his federal petition, he was in state prison serving his twenty-year sentence on the underlying state judgment he was challenging. He therefore met the “in custody” requirement for filing a federal habeas petition challenging his underlying state judgment. Maleng v. Cook, 490 U.S. 488, 490-91 (1989) (per curiam); Garding v. Montana Dep’t of Corr., 105 F.4th 1247, 1256 (9th Cir. 2024). 3. On December 22, 2019, petitioner was released from prison and placed on parole. On December 21, 2022, petitioner was discharged from parole, and is no longer in custody on the underlying judgment being challenged in this federal habeas action. However, because petitioner filed his federal petition while he was in custody on the underlying judgment being challenged, his release from custody during the pendency of his federal proceeding does not deprive this Court of jurisdiction over the petition, because of the presumed “continuing collateral consequences” of the underlying state judgment. Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7-8 (1998). 4. In light of the above stipulated facts and legal authorities, Mr. Tamor has decided that his motion to withdraw as counsel is moot, and he hereby retracts the motion to withdraw (Dkt. No. 211). //// //// //// //// //// //// Dated: November 17, 2025 Respectfully submitted, Attorney General of California Deputy Attorney General /s/ Michele J. Swanson Supervising Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Respondent Dated: November 17, 2025 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Richard Tamor RICHARD TAMOR Attorney at Law Attorney for Petitioner [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The Court accepts the above joint statement and stipulation of the parties, and finds that the Court retains jurisdiction over this federal habeas proceeding for the reasons set forth by the parties. The parties should continue to follow the relevant schedule set forth by the Court in its order dated November 13, 2025 (Dkt. No. 217). Specifically, the parties should proceed to follow paragraphs 3, 4(a), 5(a), 6 of that order. DATED: _N_o_v_e_m__b_e_r_ 1_8 , 2025 ________________________________________ The Honorable William H. Alsup United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mar-Nique Simon v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California, (N.D. Cal. 2025).

Mar-Nique Simon v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California (Mar-Nique Simon v. Rob Bonta, Attorney General of California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maleng v. Cook
490 U.S. 488 (Supreme Court, 1989)
Spencer v. Kemna
523 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1998)
Katie Garding v. Montana Department of Corrections
105 F.4th 1247 (Ninth Circuit, 2024)