Mar-Mes Construction Co. v. Gitlow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mar-Mes Construction Co. v. Gitlow

24 A.D.2d 481, 260 N.Y.S.2d 703, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3944

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 24 A.D.2d 481 (Mar-Mes Construction Co. v. Gitlow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mar-Mes Construction Co. v. Gitlow, 24 A.D.2d 481, 260 N.Y.S.2d 703, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3944 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the OPIiR to annul the rejection by the respondent Board of Education of all bids for the general construction work of a high school, and to compel the board to award the contract to the petitioner, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered March 4, 1965 after a hearing at which both parties adduced proof, which dismissed the petition on the merits. Judgment affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Under the circumstances, upon declaring the lowest bidder in default, the board was warranted in rejecting all other bids and readvertising for new bids in accordance with the power vested in it by statute (General Municipal Law, § 103, subd. 1). Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the OPIiR to annul the rejection by the respondent Board of Education of all bids for the general construction work of a high school, and to compel the board to award the contract to the petitioner, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered March 4, 1965 after a hearing at which both parties adduced proof, which dismissed the petition on the merits. Judgment affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Under the circumstances, upon declaring the lowest bidder in default, the board was warranted in rejecting all other bids and readvertising for new bids in accordance with the power vested in it by statute (General Municipal Law, § 103, subd. 1). Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 481, 260 N.Y.S.2d 703, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mar-mes-construction-co-v-gitlow-nyappdiv-1965.