Maquilacero S.A. de C v. v. United States

282 F. Supp. 3d 1353, 2018 CIT 8
United States Court of International Trade·Decided February 9, 2018·No. 15-00287·Published

Opinion

Eaton, Judge:

Before the court are the United States Department of Commerce's ("Commerce") Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand (Dep't Commerce Nov. 27, 2017), ECF No. 51-1 ("Remand Results"). The Remand Results carry out the court's direction in Maquilacero S.A. de C.V. v. United States , 41 CIT ----, 256 F.Supp.3d 1294 (2017) that "Commerce ... find that stenciling is not required for Maquilacero's products to be excluded from the scope of the Order and that, based on Prolamsa's Final Scope Ruling, the analysis found on pages 6-9 of the Final Scope Ruling, and this opinion, Maquilacero's pipe [be] excluded from the Order." Maquilacero , 41 CIT at ----, 256 F.Supp.3d at 1314 . Commerce complied and found that Maquilacero's pipe was excluded from the Order. See Remand Results at 12. Both plaintiff and defendant agree that Commerce's Remand Results complied with the court's direction in Maquilacero , and defendant-intervenor did not file comments regarding the Remand Results. See Pl.'s Comments on Remand Results, ECF No. 53; Def.'s Resp. Comments Regarding Remand Results, ECF No. 54. Therefore, in accordance with the forgoing, and upon consideration of the papers and proceedings had herein, it is hereby

ORDERED that Commerce's Remand Results are sustained.

Judgment shall be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maquilacero S.A. de C v. v. United States, 282 F. Supp. 3d 1353, 2018 CIT 8 (cit 2018).

282 F. Supp. 3d 1353 (Maquilacero S.A. de C v. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maquilacero S.A. de C v. v. United States
256 F. Supp. 3d 1294 (Court of International Trade, 2017)