Mapps, Tilton Joshua Isaiah
This text of Mapps, Tilton Joshua Isaiah (Mapps, Tilton Joshua Isaiah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-89,028-02
IN RE TILTON JOSHUA ISAIAH MAPPS, Relator
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS CAUSE NO. 1524810A IN THE 8TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HOPKINS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original
jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he has not received copies of documents pertaining
to his application for a writ of habeas corpus in the 8th District Court of Hokpins County, which was
remanded to that court on October 24, 2018, for affidavits and findings of fact. While the habeas
application was on remand, the trial court obtained an affidavit from trial counsel and entered
findings of fact and conclusions of law before forwarding the supplemental record to this Court.
Relator alleges that he never received copies of the documents contained in the supplemental
record, including any answer filed by the State and the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions 2
of law. Pursuant to Article 11.07 §7 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure and Rule 73.5(b)(2),
the district clerk has a duty to mail or deliver copies of all answers, motions, pleadings, objections,
affidavits, exhibits and proposed or entered findings of fact and conclusions of law relating to an
application for writ of habeas corpus to the applicant.
In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of
Hopkins County, is ordered to file a response, stating whether copies of all documents relating to
Relator’s application for writ of habeas corpus have been mailed or delivered to Applicant. If copies
of the documents in question have been sent to Applicant, the clerk shall specify the dates upon
which the documents were sent and the manner by which they were sent. If the clerk has not yet
provided copies of the documents to Applicant, the clerk shall immediately do so and shall provide
this Court with proof of the date upon which those documents were sent and the manner by which
they were sent. This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until
Respondent has submitted the appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 30
days of the date of this order.
Filed: June 5, 2019
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mapps, Tilton Joshua Isaiah, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mapps-tilton-joshua-isaiah-texcrimapp-2019.