Maples v. State
74 S.E. 89, 10 Ga. App. 786, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 685
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 19, 1912·No. 3920; 3921; 3922; 3923; 3924·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
.Th~ coitrt is without jurisdiction of a bill of exceptions cornplaining solely of tile refusal of the trial judge to permit a demand for ti~ial in a criminal case to be entered upon the minutes. Sharpe v. State, ante 212 (73 S. E. 33). Upon motion of the plaintiffs in error, directic~n is given that the copy bill of exceptions in each of the fdregoing ~ses, which has been filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court, ~ay operate as exceptions pendente lite.
Writs of error dismissed, with direction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Maples v. State, 74 S.E. 89, 10 Ga. App. 786, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 685 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).
74 S.E. 89 (Maples v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Reid v. State
158 S.E.2d 461 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
Bishop v. State
75 S.E. 165 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)