Maples v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Maples v. State

74 S.E. 89, 10 Ga. App. 786, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 685

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 19, 1912

Docket3920; 3921; 3922; 3923; 3924

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 74 S.E. 89 (Maples v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maples v. State, 74 S.E. 89, 10 Ga. App. 786, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 685 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Pottle, J.

.Th~ coitrt is without jurisdiction of a bill of exceptions cornplaining solely of tile refusal of the trial judge to permit a demand for ti~ial in a criminal case to be entered upon the minutes. Sharpe v. State, ante 212 (73 S. E. 33). Upon motion of the plaintiffs in error, directic~n is given that the copy bill of exceptions in each of the fdregoing ~ses, which has been filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court, ~ay operate as exceptions pendente lite.

Writs of error dismissed, with direction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pottle, J.

.Th~ coitrt is without jurisdiction of a bill of exceptions cornplaining solely of tile refusal of the trial judge to permit a demand for ti~ial in a criminal case to be entered upon the minutes. Sharpe v. State, ante 212 (73 S. E. 33). Upon motion of the plaintiffs in error, directic~n is given that the copy bill of exceptions in each of the fdregoing ~ses, which has been filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court, ~ay operate as exceptions pendente lite.

Writs of error dismissed, with direction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 S.E. 89, 10 Ga. App. 786, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maples-v-state-gactapp-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack