Maples v. State

867 S.W.2d 467, 315 Ark. 601, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 3
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJanuary 24, 1994
DocketCR 93-1318
StatusPublished

This text of 867 S.W.2d 467 (Maples v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maples v. State, 867 S.W.2d 467, 315 Ark. 601, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 3 (Ark. 1994).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, David Michael Maples, asks this court to issue a writ of certiorari directing the court reporter, Linda Caswell, to complete the transcript in this case. Petitioner states that the court reporter has been unable to prepare the record because of numerous trials and appeals, and asks for an unspecified additional amount of time for the reporter to complete the transcript. Petitioner filed a partial record on December 12, 1993, and states that the transcript was due in this court on the same date. In sum, the reporter has not completed the transcript, is now slightly more than one month past the seven month deadline, and has given only a general reason for needing additional time.

We grant the petition for the writ of certiorari and direct Ms. Caswell to complete the transcript forthwith. The clerk is directed to forward a copy of this per curiam to the Board of Certified Court Reporter Examiners for any action it may deem necessary under its rules.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
867 S.W.2d 467, 315 Ark. 601, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maples-v-state-ark-1994.