Maple v. Lawhun

Appellate Court of Illinois

Maple v. Lawhun

200 Ill. App. 258

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided April 14, 1916·No. Gen. No. 6,175·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Dibell

delivered the opinion of the court.

5. Executors and administrators, § 97*—when evidence sufficient to show that note belonging to decedent not given in payment ■for services. In proceedings by citation under the Administration Act, sec. 81 (J. & A. V 130), for the discovery of concealed effects of a decedent alleged to be in possession of respondent, evidence held sufficient to sustain a finding that a note belonging to decedent was not given to respondent in payment for alleged services.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Dibell

delivered the opinion of the court.

5. Executors and administrators, § 97*—when evidence sufficient to show that note belonging to decedent not given in payment ■for services. In proceedings by citation under the Administration Act, sec. 81 (J. & A. V 130), for the discovery of concealed effects of a decedent alleged to be in possession of respondent, evidence held sufficient to sustain a finding that a note belonging to decedent was not given to respondent in payment for alleged services.

Maple v. Lawhun, 200 Ill. App. 258 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

200 Ill. App. 258 (Maple v. Lawhun) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related