Maple Med., LLP v. Mutic

2020 NY Slip Op 07365, 133 N.Y.S.3d 891, 189 A.D.3d 1019
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 9, 2020
DocketIndex No. 51108/19
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2020 NY Slip Op 07365 (Maple Med., LLP v. Mutic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maple Med., LLP v. Mutic, 2020 NY Slip Op 07365, 133 N.Y.S.3d 891, 189 A.D.3d 1019 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Maple Med., LLP v Mutic (2020 NY Slip Op 07365)
Maple Med., LLP v Mutic
2020 NY Slip Op 07365
Decided on December 9, 2020
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on December 9, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J.
MARK C. DILLON
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, JJ.

2019-09162
(Index No. 51108/19)

[*1]Maple Medical, LLP, respondent,

v

Mario Mutic, etc., appellant, et al., defendant.


Nolan Heller Kauffman LLP, Albany, NY (Justin A. Heller and Brendan J. Carosi of counsel), for appellant.

Finger & Finger, White Plains, NY (Carl L. Finger of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action, inter alia, for a declaratory judgment and to recover damages for unjust enrichment, the defendant Mario Mutic appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lawrence H. Ecker, J.), dated July 5, 2019. The order and judgment, insofar as appealed from, granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was which was for summary judgment declaring that it is entitled to receive certain funds in the amount of $52,000, denied that branch of the cross motion of the defendant Mario Mutic which was for summary judgment on his counterclaim for a judgment declaring that he is entitled to receive those funds, declared that the plaintiff is entitled to receive the subject funds, and directed the escrow agent to release the funds to the plaintiff.

ORDERED that the order and judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment declaring that it is entitled to receive certain funds in the amount of $52,000 is denied, that branch of the cross motion of the defendant Mario Mutic which was for summary judgment on his counterclaim for a judgment declaring that he is entitled to receive those funds is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for the entry of a judgment, among other things, declaring that the defendant Mario Mutic is entitled to receive the subject funds in the principal amount of $52,000 and directing the release of the funds to that defendant 30 days after service of this decision and order with notice of entry, provided that in the event the plaintiff timely moves for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, the funds shall remain in escrow pending a determination of such motion and, if such motion is granted, pending a determination of that appeal.

We reverse the order and judgment insofar as appealed from for the reasons stated in Maple Med., LLP v Scott, ___ AD3d ___ [Appellate Division Docket No. 2019-09157; decided herewith]).

SCHEINKMAN, P.J., DILLON, DUFFY and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2020 NY Slip Op 07365, 133 N.Y.S.3d 891, 189 A.D.3d 1019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maple-med-llp-v-mutic-nyappdiv-2020.