Maola Industries v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 521
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedApril 16, 1958
DocketNo. 61831; protests 244355-K (A) and 262677-K (A) (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 40 Cust. Ct. 521 (Maola Industries v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Maola Industries v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 521 (cusc 1958).

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of mechanical hydraulic vises, not hand tools, but which are parts of machine tools (other than jig-boring machine tools), which would now be returned as parts of machine tools, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 Cust. Ct. 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maola-industries-v-united-states-cusc-1958.