Mao v. Bright

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON JU MAO ; CASE NO. 3:22cv201 Plaintiff, : JUDGE WALTER H. RICE v. : FOREST MITCHELL BRIGHT ; Defendant. ;

ORDER OF DISMISSAL; TERMINATION ENTRY

The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Parties intending to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114 S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED.

| ‘ yf Awe t} \ yo WALTER H. RICE, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT