Manzzo v. Deutsche Bank
This text of Manzzo v. Deutsche Bank (Manzzo v. Deutsche Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed February 13, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D18-612 Lower Tribunal No. 14-1792 ________________
Gisselle Manzzo, Appellant,
vs.
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, etc., Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Reemberto Diaz, Judge.
Arthur J. Morburger, for appellant.
Holland & Knight LLP, and Brian K. Hole and Katherine M. Joffe (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.
Before EMAS, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and LOGUE, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Gisselle Manzzo appeals the trial court’s entry of Final Judgment, granting
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company’s motion for a directed verdict and
dismissing her action for declaratory relief and to quiet title with prejudice. Based
on the record before us, we find no reversible error in the trial court’s rulings
below. See, e.g., Barclay v. Rivero, 388 So. 2d 321, 321-22 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980);
Fuller v. Palm Auto Plaza, Inc., 683 So. 2d 654, 655 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Horacio
O. Ferrea N. Am. Div., Inc. v. Moroso Performance Prods., Inc., 553 So. 2d 336,
337 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Manzzo v. Deutsche Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manzzo-v-deutsche-bank-fladistctapp-2019.