Manzoni v. Hoffarth

134 A.D.2d 838, 522 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51010
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 10, 1987·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs negligence action against a coemployee was not barred by the exclusivity provisions of Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 (6). The record clearly establishes that at the time of this accident, plaintiff was crossing a public street on his way to work when he was struck by defendant, who was driving to work in his vehicle but was approximately one-half mile from the building where he worked and the parking lot he intended to use. The hazards of travel on public highways are a risk of life in general and are not within the scope of employment within the meaning of the Workers’ Compensation Law (Matter of Husted v Seneca Steel Serv., 50 AD2d 76, 78, affd 41 NY2d 140). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Curran, J. — strike affirmative defense.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manzoni v. Hoffarth, 134 A.D.2d 838, 522 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51010 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

134 A.D.2d 838 (Manzoni v. Hoffarth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Connell v. Brink
199 A.D.2d 1032 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)