Manzo v. Ajello
This text of 216 A.D. 733 (Manzo v. Ajello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order granting plaintiff’s motion to open her default in serving complaint reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to plaintiff to renew said motion upon payment of costs within [734]*734ten days. Plaintiff, in her application, fails to set forth any fact showing a meritorious cause of action. This was necessary to entitle plaintiff to the relief sought. (Titus v. Halsted, 209 App. Div. 66; Heischober v. Polishook, 152 id. 193; Fitzgerald Manufacturing Co. v. Alexander, 200 id. 164.) Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Young and Lazansky, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
216 A.D. 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manzo-v-ajello-nyappdiv-1926.