Manzi v. Louden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Manzi v. Louden

258 A.D. 973, 17 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8495

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 973 (Manzi v. Louden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manzi v. Louden, 258 A.D. 973, 17 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8495 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action brought by a husband, wife and two infant children to recover damages for personal injuries and property damage sustained in a collision between two automobiles, alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence, the jury returned a verdict against the husband but in favor of the three remaining plaintiffs. Defendant appeals from that portion of the judgment which allows a recovery in favor of said plaintiffs and from an order denying her motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. Judgment, in so far as an appeal is taken therefrom, and order reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The verdict in favor of three of the four plaintiffs was against the weight of the credible evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action brought by a husband, wife and two infant children to recover damages for personal injuries and property damage sustained in a collision between two automobiles, alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence, the jury returned a verdict against the husband but in favor of the three remaining plaintiffs. Defendant appeals from that portion of the judgment which allows a recovery in favor of said plaintiffs and from an order denying her motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. Judgment, in so far as an appeal is taken therefrom, and order reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The verdict in favor of three of the four plaintiffs was against the weight of the credible evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 973, 17 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manzi-v-louden-nyappdiv-1940.