Manzella v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
This text of 739 N.W.2d 628 (Manzella v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Renie MANZELLA and Joseph Manzella, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, and
Israel Maldonado Morado, Fernando Ojeda Miranda, and Progressive Michigan Insurance Company, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 4, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 28 days of the date of this order, but they *629 should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
739 N.W.2d 628, 480 Mich. 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manzella-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-company-mich-2007.