Manzella v. Milano
This text of 82 A.D.3d 1242 (Manzella v. Milano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
“In order to modify an existing custody or visitation arrangement, there must be a showing that there has been a change in circumstances such that modification is required to protect the best interests of the child” (Matter of Arduino v Ayuso, 70 AD3d 682, 682 [2010]; see Matter of Quinones v Ibarrondo, 67 AD3d 686, 686 [2009]). “The court’s determination [with respect to custody and visitation] depends to a great extent upon its assessment of the credibility of the witnesses and upon the character, temperament, and sincerity of the parents” (Matter of Blanco v Corbett, 8 AD3d 374, 374 [2004]). As such, the credibility findings of the hearing court are entitled to great weight and should not be disturbed unless they lack a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Sinnott-Tumer v Kolba, 60 AD3d 774, 775 [2009]; Cashel v Cashel, 46 AD3d 501 [2007]). Here, contrary to the mother’s contention, the Family Court’s determination had a sound and substantial basis in the record.
The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.E, Dickerson, Eng and Lott, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
82 A.D.3d 1242, 919 N.Y.2d 854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manzella-v-milano-nyappdiv-2011.