Manzella v. Milano

82 A.D.3d 1242, 919 N.Y.2d 854
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 29, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 82 A.D.3d 1242 (Manzella v. Milano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manzella v. Milano, 82 A.D.3d 1242, 919 N.Y.2d 854 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

“In order to modify an existing custody or visitation arrangement, there must be a showing that there has been a change in circumstances such that modification is required to protect the best interests of the child” (Matter of Arduino v Ayuso, 70 AD3d 682, 682 [2010]; see Matter of Quinones v Ibarrondo, 67 AD3d 686, 686 [2009]). “The court’s determination [with respect to custody and visitation] depends to a great extent upon its assessment of the credibility of the witnesses and upon the character, temperament, and sincerity of the parents” (Matter of Blanco v Corbett, 8 AD3d 374, 374 [2004]). As such, the credibility findings of the hearing court are entitled to great weight and should not be disturbed unless they lack a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Sinnott-Tumer v Kolba, 60 AD3d 774, 775 [2009]; Cashel v Cashel, 46 AD3d 501 [2007]). Here, contrary to the mother’s contention, the Family Court’s determination had a sound and substantial basis in the record.

The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. Rivera, J.E, Dickerson, Eng and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Pena v. Tiburcio
2018 NY Slip Op 3981 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Rodriguez-Donaghy v. Donaghy
138 A.D.3d 1123 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Hargrove v. Langenau
138 A.D.3d 846 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Saldana v. Lopresti
133 A.D.3d 669 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Matter of Rosenblatt v. Rosenblatt
129 A.D.3d 1091 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Whitehead v. Whitehead
122 A.D.3d 921 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Matter of Rodriguez v. Silva
121 A.D.3d 794 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Matter of Weiss v. Rosenthal
120 A.D.3d 505 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Cordova v. Vagianos
101 A.D.3d 1118 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Zwillman v. Kull
90 A.D.3d 774 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 A.D.3d 1242, 919 N.Y.2d 854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manzella-v-milano-nyappdiv-2011.