Manzano v. State

27 So. 3d 781, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1568, 2010 WL 532857
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 17, 2010·No. 3D10-56·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order denying a motion for postconviction relief, in which Sonny S. Manzano seeks to set aside the plea she entered in 2000, because she alleges that she was not warned of the immigration consequences of the plea. The motion of defendant-appellant Manzano was filed December 2, 2009.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying relief because the window period created by State v. Green, 944 So.2d 208 (Fla. 2006), ran two years from October 26, 2006. The motion was filed after the expiration of the window period.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manzano v. State, 27 So. 3d 781, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1568, 2010 WL 532857 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

27 So. 3d 781 (Manzano v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hooker v. State
63 So. 3d 864 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)