Manzano v. State

27 So. 3d 781, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1568, 2010 WL 532857
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 17, 2010
Docket3D10-56
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 27 So. 3d 781 (Manzano v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manzano v. State, 27 So. 3d 781, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1568, 2010 WL 532857 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order denying a motion for postconviction relief, in which Sonny S. Manzano seeks to set aside the plea she entered in 2000, because she alleges that she was not warned of the immigration consequences of the plea. The motion of defendant-appellant Manzano was filed December 2, 2009.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying relief because the window period created by State v. Green, 944 So.2d 208 (Fla. 2006), ran two years from October 26, 2006. The motion was filed after the expiration of the window period.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hooker v. State
63 So. 3d 864 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 So. 3d 781, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1568, 2010 WL 532857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manzano-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.