Manzanero v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Manzanero v. State

467 So. 2d 840, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1093, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13754

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 1, 1985

DocketNo. 84-2016

StatusPublished

This text of 467 So. 2d 840 (Manzanero v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manzanero v. State, 467 So. 2d 840, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1093, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13754 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the conviction for conspiracy as the trial court, in our view, should have granted appellant’s motions for acquittal and new trial on this charge because the evidence of conspiracy was insufficient.

We affirm the other charge of trafficking in cocaine and find, given the evidence of appellant’s actions, that the admission of co-conspirator statements was harmless error as to the trafficking charge.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the conviction for conspiracy as the trial court, in our view, should have granted appellant’s motions for acquittal and new trial on this charge because the evidence of conspiracy was insufficient.

We affirm the other charge of trafficking in cocaine and find, given the evidence of appellant’s actions, that the admission of co-conspirator statements was harmless error as to the trafficking charge.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

467 So. 2d 840, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1093, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manzanero-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.