Manz v. Tenafly Trust Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Manz v. Tenafly Trust Co.

187 A. 137, 121 N.J. Eq. 112

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 5, 1936·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal is from a decree in the court of chancery holding that John Manz in his lifetime had made to the complainant a valid gift of the moneys on deposit to his credit in the defendant trust company. The proofs examined clearly support the findings of the court.

The decree is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heiier, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Woles-Kbil, Raeeerty, JJ. 11. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appeal is from a decree in the court of chancery holding that John Manz in his lifetime had made to the complainant a valid gift of the moneys on deposit to his credit in the defendant trust company. The proofs examined clearly support the findings of the court.

The decree is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heiier, Perskie, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Woles-Kbil, Raeeerty, JJ. 11. For reversal — None.

Manz v. Tenafly Trust Co., 187 A. 137, 121 N.J. Eq. 112 (N.J. 1936).

Pincite

187 A. 137 (Manz v. Tenafly Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.