MANYOTHWANE v. State
318 S.W.3d 785, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1119, 2010 WL 3394667
Opinion
ORDER
Peter Manyothwane appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after waiving his right to an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
MANYOTHWANE v. State, 318 S.W.3d 785, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1119, 2010 WL 3394667 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
318 S.W.3d 785 (MANYOTHWANE v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
LAZZARINE v. Sayers
318 S.W.3d 785 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)