Manygoat v. New Mexico State Supreme Court

D. New Mexico

Manygoat v. New Mexico State Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 10, 2022

Docket2:21-cv-00683

StatusUnknown

This text of Manygoat v. New Mexico State Supreme Court (Manygoat v. New Mexico State Supreme Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Mexico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manygoat v. New Mexico State Supreme Court, (D.N.M. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO HERBERT MANYGOAT, Petitioner, v. Civ. No. 21-683 KG/GJF HECTOR H. BALDERAS, Attorney General for the State of New Mexico, et al., Respondents. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte in connection with the Order Granting Respondent’s Motion for a More Definite Statement, filed September 28, 2022 [ECF 17] (“the Order”). The Order required Petitioner to file a Second Amended Petition within thirty days, a period that expired on October 28, 2022. Yet, despite the Court affording Petitioner a grace period to account for the “prison mailbox rule,’””’ he failed to timely respond. Indeed, even as of today, Petitioner has filed nothing in response to the Order. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, by November 30, 2022, Petitioner shall show cause in writing why his failure to comply with the Order should not result in the dismissal of this action. Petitioner is expressly cautioned that his failure to comply with this order to show cause will result in the DISMISSAL of this action. SO ORDERED.

f A seen Oe Hetes aa THE HO □□□ BLE GREGORY J. FOURATT UNITED/STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1 See generally Lockaby y. Young, 42 F. App’x 313 (10th Cir. 2002) (unpublished).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO HERBERT MANYGOAT, Petitioner, v. Civ. No. 21-683 KG/GJF HECTOR H. BALDERAS, Attorney General for the State of New Mexico, et al., Respondents. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte in connection with the Order Granting Respondent’s Motion for a More Definite Statement, filed September 28, 2022 [ECF 17] (“the Order”). The Order required Petitioner to file a Second Amended Petition within thirty days, a period that expired on October 28, 2022. Yet, despite the Court affording Petitioner a grace period to account for the “prison mailbox rule,’””’ he failed to timely respond. Indeed, even as of today, Petitioner has filed nothing in response to the Order. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, by November 30, 2022, Petitioner shall show cause in writing why his failure to comply with the Order should not result in the dismissal of this action. Petitioner is expressly cautioned that his failure to comply with this order to show cause will result in the DISMISSAL of this action. SO ORDERED.

f A seen Oe Hetes aa THE HO □□□ BLE GREGORY J. FOURATT UNITED/STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1 See generally Lockaby y. Young, 42 F. App’x 313 (10th Cir. 2002) (unpublished).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Manygoat v. New Mexico State Supreme Court, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manygoat-v-new-mexico-state-supreme-court-nmd-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack