Manuszewski v. Merchants Mutual Insurance

60 A.D.2d 792, 400 N.Y.S.2d 660, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14857
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 16, 1977·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Under any interpretation the allegations of the complaint seeking damages against the plaintiff clearly come within the exclusion of the policy. There exists no factual basis or legal theory which may be developed at trial arising out of this incident that would obligate the defendant insurance company to pay and, therefore, there is no duty to defend (Lionel Freedman, Inc. v Glen Falls Ins. Co., 27 NY2d 364; Vale v Yawarski, 79 Misc 2d 320; cf. International Paper Co. v Continental Cas. Co., 35 NY2d 322, 325). (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court—declaratory judgment.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Dillon, Hancock, Jr., and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manuszewski v. Merchants Mutual Insurance, 60 A.D.2d 792, 400 N.Y.S.2d 660, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14857 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

60 A.D.2d 792 (Manuszewski v. Merchants Mutual Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cole's Restaurant, Inc. v. North River Insurance
85 A.D.2d 894 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
American Home Assurance Co. v. Firestone
74 A.D.2d 720 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
County of Monroe v. Travelers Insurance Companies
100 Misc. 2d 41 (New York Supreme Court, 1979)