Manuszewski v. Merchants Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Manuszewski v. Merchants Mutual Insurance

60 A.D.2d 792, 400 N.Y.S.2d 660, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14857

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 16, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 60 A.D.2d 792 (Manuszewski v. Merchants Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manuszewski v. Merchants Mutual Insurance, 60 A.D.2d 792, 400 N.Y.S.2d 660, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14857 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Under any interpretation the allegations of the complaint seeking damages against the plaintiff clearly come within the exclusion of the policy. There exists no factual basis or legal theory which may be developed at trial arising out of this incident that would obligate the defendant insurance company to pay and, therefore, there is no duty to defend (Lionel Freedman, Inc. v Glen Falls Ins. Co., 27 NY2d 364; Vale v Yawarski, 79 Misc 2d 320; cf. International Paper Co. v Continental Cas. Co., 35 NY2d 322, 325). (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court—declaratory judgment.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Dillon, Hancock, Jr., and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Under any interpretation the allegations of the complaint seeking damages against the plaintiff clearly come within the exclusion of the policy. There exists no factual basis or legal theory which may be developed at trial arising out of this incident that would obligate the defendant insurance company to pay and, therefore, there is no duty to defend (Lionel Freedman, Inc. v Glen Falls Ins. Co., 27 NY2d 364; Vale v Yawarski, 79 Misc 2d 320; cf. International Paper Co. v Continental Cas. Co., 35 NY2d 322, 325). (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court—declaratory judgment.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Dillon, Hancock, Jr., and Witmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 A.D.2d 792, 400 N.Y.S.2d 660, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manuszewski-v-merchants-mutual-insurance-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack