Manuszewski v. Keele

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Manuszewski v. Keele

257 A.D. 1036, 13 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8982

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 28, 1939·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Upon the facts as found by the referee, the judgment restraining the defendant from competing with the plaintiffs was rightly granted. (American Ice Co. v. Meckel, [1037]*1037109 App. Div. 93; Von Bremen v. MacMonnies, 200 N. Y. 41.) The referee adopted the correct rule for the admeasurement of damages. (Present v. Glaser, 225 App. Div. 23.) All concur. (The judgment enjoins defendant from operating a gasoline station in competition with a station sold to plaintiffs by defendant.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Upon the facts as found by the referee, the judgment restraining the defendant from competing with the plaintiffs was rightly granted. (American Ice Co. v. Meckel, [1037]*1037109 App. Div. 93; Von Bremen v. MacMonnies, 200 N. Y. 41.) The referee adopted the correct rule for the admeasurement of damages. (Present v. Glaser, 225 App. Div. 23.) All concur. (The judgment enjoins defendant from operating a gasoline station in competition with a station sold to plaintiffs by defendant.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Manuszewski v. Keele, 257 A.D. 1036, 13 N.Y.S.2d 852, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8982 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

257 A.D. 1036 (Manuszewski v. Keele) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related