Manufacturing Co. v. . Bell

161 S.E. 923, 201 N.C. 846, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 149
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 23, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 161 S.E. 923 (Manufacturing Co. v. . Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manufacturing Co. v. . Bell, 161 S.E. 923, 201 N.C. 846, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 149 (N.C. 1931).

Opinion

Civil action to determine the rights of the parties under a consent judgment, tried upon the following issue:

"Is the plaintiff the owner of an easement or privilege in the water line, ditch, flume or conduit described in the complaint and entitled to get water from the reservoir on the lands of J. O. Bell, Jr., by virtue of the consent judgment rendered at the May-June Term, 1928, in the various cases then determined between Green River Manufacturing Company, F. D. Bell, J. O. Bell, and J. O. Bell, Sr., as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes."

Judgment on the verdict for plaintiff, from which the defendants appeal. *Page 847 No error has been shown in the trial court's interpretation of the consent judgment. This is all the case presents. The principles applicable were discussed in Blankenship v. Dowtin, 191 N.C. 790, 133 S.E. 199.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blankenship v. . Dowtin
133 S.E. 199 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)
Blankenship v. Dowtin
191 N.C. 790 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 S.E. 923, 201 N.C. 846, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manufacturing-co-v-bell-nc-1931.