Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v. County Trust Region of the Bank

59 A.D.2d 645, 398 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13517
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 23, 1977·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Defendant payor bank failed to dishonor and return the check at issue prior to its midnight deadline and thus is accountable for the amount of the instrument (Uniform Commercial Code, § 4-301, subd [1]; § 4-302, subd [a]). Although the check is not actually one of the drawer’s, it is nevertheless a writing which qualifies as a check pursuant to section 3-104 of the Uniform Commercial Code. Since the check falsely purports to have been signed by the drawer’s agent, defendant contends that plaintiff breached its warranties on presentment. It is clear, however, that a collecting bank’s warranty on presentment in this regard is limited to a representation that it has no knowledge that the drawer’s signature is unauthorized (Uniform Commercial Code, § 4-207, subd [1], par [b], cl [in]). (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court—summary judgment.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Dillon, Goldman and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v. County Trust Region of the Bank, 59 A.D.2d 645, 398 N.Y.S.2d 298, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13517 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

59 A.D.2d 645 (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v. County Trust Region of the Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Interbank v. Fleet Bank
4 Misc. 3d 52 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Interbank of New York v. Fleet Bank
189 Misc. 2d 20 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2001)