Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v. Consolidated Construction Group, LLC

114 A.D.3d 834, 980 N.Y.S.2d 793

This text of 114 A.D.3d 834 (Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v. Consolidated Construction Group, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v. Consolidated Construction Group, LLC, 114 A.D.3d 834, 980 N.Y.S.2d 793 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Fines, J.), dated March 14, 2013, which denied their motion to vacate a judgment of the same court dated November 8, 2012, which was in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the total sum of $147,728.06.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A defendant seeking to vacate a default must provide a reasonable excuse for the default and demonstrate a potentially meritorious defense to the action (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v A.C. Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 NY2d 138, 141 [1986]; Yao Ping Tang v Grand Estate, LLC, 77 AD3d 822, 822-823 [2010]). “A decision to vacate a prior order or judgment rests in the sound discretion of the court and will be upheld in the absence of an improvident exercise of that discretion” (Epps v LaSalle Bus, 271 AD2d 400 [2000]).

Here, the appellants did not offer a reasonable excuse for their failure to appear at the inquest on damages (see White v Daimler Chrysler Corp., 44 AD3d 651, 651-652 [2007]; cf. Matter of Esposito, 57 AD3d 894, 895 [2008]). Accordingly, it is unnecessary to consider whether the appellants sufficiently demonstrated the existence of a potentially meritorious defense (see Maida v Lessing’s Rest. Servs., Inc., 80 AD3d 732, 733 [2011]; Abdul v Hirschfield, 71 AD3d 707, 709 [2010]). Rivera, J.E, Dickerson, Cohen and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. A. C. Dutton Lumber Co.
492 N.E.2d 116 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
White v. Daimler Chrysler Corp.
44 A.D.3d 651 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
In re the Estate of Esposito
57 A.D.3d 894 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Abdul v. Hirschfield
71 A.D.3d 707 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Yao Ping Tang v. Grand Estate, LLC
77 A.D.3d 822 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Maida v. Lessing's Restaurant Services, Inc.
80 A.D.3d 732 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Epps v. LaSalle Bus, Inc.
271 A.D.2d 400 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 A.D.3d 834, 980 N.Y.S.2d 793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manufacturers-traders-trust-co-v-consolidated-construction-group-llc-nyappdiv-2014.