Manufacturers National Bank v. Toole
This text of 242 A.D. 893 (Manufacturers National Bank v. Toole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Hill, P. J., McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur; Heffernan, J., dissents. The complaint alleged a cause of action on a promissory note. The answer pleaded section 1077-b of the Civil Practice Act, the moratorium statute. Simultaneously with the giving of the note defendants gave a real estate mortgage and a chattel mortgage in separate documents. The real estate mortgage not being the “ sole ” security for the debt, the statute did not apply. [152 Mise. 724.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
242 A.D. 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manufacturers-national-bank-v-toole-nyappdiv-1934.