Manufacturers' National Bank v. Jones

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Manufacturers' National Bank v. Jones

2 Pennyp. 377

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 23, 1882

DocketNo. 8

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 2 Pennyp. 377 (Manufacturers' National Bank v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manufacturers' National Bank v. Jones, 2 Pennyp. 377 (Pa. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

— Per Curiam:

It is established, as is shown in the opinion of our brother Trunkey, in Dougherty v. Central Rational Bank, 9 Weekly Notes, 1, that a bank has no lien on money standing to the credit of one of its depositors for the amount of a note of such depositor, [380]*380discounted by the bank, but which has not matured. It is clear that the mere insolvency of the depositor intervening cannot aifect the question as against a creditor attaching the fund.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Per Curiam:

It is established, as is shown in the opinion of our brother Trunkey, in Dougherty v. Central Rational Bank, 9 Weekly Notes, 1, that a bank has no lien on money standing to the credit of one of its depositors for the amount of a note of such depositor, [380]*380discounted by the bank, but which has not matured. It is clear that the mere insolvency of the depositor intervening cannot aifect the question as against a creditor attaching the fund.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Pennyp. 377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manufacturers-national-bank-v-jones-pa-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack