Manufacturers' National Bank v. Jones
2 Pennyp. 377
Opinion
It is established, as is shown in the opinion of our brother Trunkey, in Dougherty v. Central Rational Bank, 9 Weekly Notes, 1, that a bank has no lien on money standing to the credit of one of its depositors for the amount of a note of such depositor, [380] discounted by the bank, but which has not matured. It is clear that the mere insolvency of the depositor intervening cannot aifect the question as against a creditor attaching the fund.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Manufacturers' National Bank v. Jones, 2 Pennyp. 377 (Pa. 1882).
2 Pennyp. 377 (Manufacturers' National Bank v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Citizens Trust Co. v. Trunk
30 Pa. D. & C. 511 (Clarion County Court of Common Pleas, 1937)
Aarons v. Public Service Building & Loan Ass'n
318 Pa. 113 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Aarons v. Pub. Ser. B. L. Assn.
178 A. 141 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Gordon v. Tausig
16 Pa. D. & C. 539 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1932)
Schiff v. Schindler
98 Pa. Super. 207 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Southwark National Bank v. Beck
98 Pa. Super. 213 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Kurtz v. County National Bank
136 A. 789 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)