Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. West Orange Industrial Park, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. West Orange Industrial Park, Inc.

388 So. 2d 567, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16188

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 7, 1980

DocketNo. 79-163/T4-376

StatusPublished

This text of 388 So. 2d 567 (Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. West Orange Industrial Park, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. West Orange Industrial Park, Inc., 388 So. 2d 567, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16188 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from an order denying a deficiency judgment, the appellant alleges the trial court abused its discretion in failing to make an award. We have reviewed the record and can find little basis for the denial. Because the trial court entered the order with no findings of fact, we must remand the matter to the trial court for the entry of a complete order, including the findings of fact in support of the denial. Scheneman v. Barnett, 53 So.2d 641 (Fla. 1951); Steketee v. Ballance Homes, Inc., 376 So.2d 873 (Fla.2d DCA 1979); Hamilton Investment Trust v. Escambia Developers, Inc., 352 So.2d 883 (Fla.lst DCA 1977); Colmes v. Hoco, Inc. of Dade County, 152 So.2d 524 (Fla.3d DCA 1963).

Jurisdiction is relinquished for a period of thirty days, see Surratt v. Fleming, 309 So.2d 614 (Fla.lst DCA 1975), and this cause is

REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, C. J., SHARP, J., and SHARP, G. K., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from an order denying a deficiency judgment, the appellant alleges the trial court abused its discretion in failing to make an award. We have reviewed the record and can find little basis for the denial. Because the trial court entered the order with no findings of fact, we must remand the matter to the trial court for the entry of a complete order, including the findings of fact in support of the denial. Scheneman v. Barnett, 53 So.2d 641 (Fla. 1951); Steketee v. Ballance Homes, Inc., 376 So.2d 873 (Fla.2d DCA 1979); Hamilton Investment Trust v. Escambia Developers, Inc., 352 So.2d 883 (Fla.lst DCA 1977); Colmes v. Hoco, Inc. of Dade County, 152 So.2d 524 (Fla.3d DCA 1963).

Jurisdiction is relinquished for a period of thirty days, see Surratt v. Fleming, 309 So.2d 614 (Fla.lst DCA 1975), and this cause is

REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, C. J., SHARP, J., and SHARP, G. K., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

388 So. 2d 567, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manufacturers-hanover-trust-co-v-west-orange-industrial-park-inc-fladistctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack