Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Postel

38 A.D.2d 808, 330 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5391
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1972
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 38 A.D.2d 808 (Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Postel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Postel, 38 A.D.2d 808, 330 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5391 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

Application denied and the petition dismissed, without costs and without disbursements. Prohibition will not lie where another appropriate remedy exists. Upon entry of an order appointing a Referee, an appeal will lie, if petitioners be so advised. (See Matter of Cross, 25 A D 2d 645.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, McNally, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grand Central Art Galleries, Inc. v. Milstein
89 A.D.2d 178 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Candid Productions, Inc. v. SFM Media Service Corp.
51 A.D.2d 943 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 A.D.2d 808, 330 N.Y.S.2d 287, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manufacturers-hanover-trust-co-v-postel-nyappdiv-1972.