Manufacturers' Commercial Co. v. Anderson

101 N.Y.S. 823

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Without passing upon the merits involved in this litigation, we are satisfied that sufficient facts were presented to the Special Term to call for the exercise of its discretion in determining whether the existing conditions should be preserved until the trial, and that there was no abuse of the discretion in granting the injunction pendente lite.

The order appealed from should therefore be affirmed, with $10 ■costs and disbursements to the respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manufacturers' Commercial Co. v. Anderson, 101 N.Y.S. 823 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

101 N.Y.S. 823 (Manufacturers' Commercial Co. v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.