Manuel v. Whitehead

22 Tex. 556
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 22 Tex. 556 (Manuel v. Whitehead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Manuel v. Whitehead, 22 Tex. 556 (Tex. 1858).

Opinion

Wheeler, Ch. J.

The judgment is erroneous, and must be reversed, for the reason that the verdict is unsupported by evidence. No evidence appears in the statement of facts, to warrant the jury in finding for the plaintiff the amount of their verdict, upon which the court gave judgment.

It would seem, on general principles, that after it was made apparent to the court, that the plaintiff had been appointed guardian of the defendants, the suit ought to have been dismissed. But as this point has not been noticed by counsel in argument, it need not now be decided. The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Briggs v. Briggs
346 S.W.2d 106 (Texas Supreme Court, 1961)
Williams v. Sinclair-Prairie Oil Co.
135 S.W.2d 211 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1939)
Rupe v. Robison
247 P. 954 (Washington Supreme Court, 1926)
Pryor v. Krause
168 S.W. 498 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1914)
Sandoval v. Rosser
26 S.W. 932 (Texas Supreme Court, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Tex. 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manuel-v-whitehead-tex-1858.