Manuel v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Manuel v. State

1911 OK CR 108, 115 P. 605, 5 Okla. Crim. 527, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 186

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 9, 1911

DocketNo. A-569.

StatusPublished

This text of 1911 OK CR 108 (Manuel v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Manuel v. State, 1911 OK CR 108, 115 P. 605, 5 Okla. Crim. 527, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 186 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the 1st day of November, 1909, in the county court of Wagoner county, appellant was convicted for violating the prohibitory liquor law. His punishment was assessed at a fine of $100 and 60 days’ confinement in the county jail.

There was an order of the county judge extending the time within which appellant could take his appeal to this court to the 20th day of January, 1910. The writ of error, however, was not filed in this court until the 25th day of January, 1910. The record fails to show that any notice of appeal had ever been served upon the county attorney and clerk of the county court as is required by section 6949 of Snyder’s Comp. Laws of Oklahoma 1909.

This court, therefore, never acquired jurisdiction of this cause, and it must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On the 1st day of November, 1909, in the county court of Wagoner county, appellant was convicted for violating the prohibitory liquor law. His punishment was assessed at a fine of $100 and 60 days’ confinement in the county jail.

There was an order of the county judge extending the time within which appellant could take his appeal to this court to the 20th day of January, 1910. The writ of error, however, was not filed in this court until the 25th day of January, 1910. The record fails to show that any notice of appeal had ever been served upon the county attorney and clerk of the county court as is required by section 6949 of Snyder’s Comp. Laws of Oklahoma 1909.

This court, therefore, never acquired jurisdiction of this cause, and it must be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 108, 115 P. 605, 5 Okla. Crim. 527, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manuel-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.