Manuel v. Gill
728 N.W.2d 869, 477 Mich. 1067
This text of 728 N.W.2d 869 (Manuel v. Gill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Manuel v. Gill, 728 N.W.2d 869, 477 Mich. 1067 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
Iskandar MANUEL, Maggie Manuel, Jimmy Manuel, Joseph Manuel, Imad Manuel, and Adel Manuel, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Timothy J. GILL, County of Clinton, County of Eaton, Rusty Banehoff, County of Ingham, Eaton County Sheriff, Clinton County Sheriff, Kenneth Knowlton, Lansing Chief of Police, City of Lansing, Lansing Police Commission, Jimmy Patrick, and Ingham County Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees and
Tri-County Metro Narcotics Squad, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 23, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Laffin v. Laffin
728 N.W.2d 869 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
728 N.W.2d 869, 477 Mich. 1067, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manuel-v-gill-mich-2007.