Manuel Ruiz Constancio v. State
This text of Manuel Ruiz Constancio v. State (Manuel Ruiz Constancio v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-14-00221-CR
Manuel Ruiz Constancio, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 51ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY NO. A-13-1024-SA, HONORABLE JAY K. WEATHERBY, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER FOR CLERK TO PROVIDE A P P E L L A T E R E C O R D TO A P P E L L A N T
PER CURIAM
Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by
a brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel has certified to the Court that he
provided copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine
the appellate record and file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for pro
se access to the appellate record. See Kelly v. State, — S.W.3d —, No. PD-0702-13, 2014 WL
2865901, at *4 (Tex. Crim. App. June 25, 2014). Appellant has timely filed the motion
requesting access to the appellate record with this Court.
Appellant’s pro se motion is granted. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial court
to provide a copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on
or before November 14, 2014. See Kelly, — S.W.3d —, 2014 WL 2865901, at *4.
It is ordered on November 4, 2014.
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Manuel Ruiz Constancio v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manuel-ruiz-constancio-v-state-texapp-2014.