Manuel Nava, Jr. v. State
This text of Manuel Nava, Jr. v. State (Manuel Nava, Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
MEMORANDUM ORDER
Appellate case name: Manuel Nava, Jr. v. The State of Texas
Appellate case number: 01-14-00628-CR
Trial court case number: 1919049
Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 14 of Harris County
Appellant Manuel Nava, Jr. has filed a “Motion to Abate Appeal to Supplement Clerk’s Record and Direct Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.” The State has not filed a response to the motion. The motion is GRANTED. We abate the appeal and remand for the trial court to enter written findings of fact and conclusions of law, separate and apart from any docket sheet notations in this case, regarding the trial court’s denial of Nava’s motion to suppress. See State v. Cullen, 195 S.W.3d 696, 699 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (holding that trial court must provide findings of fact and conclusions of law adequate to provide appellate court with basis to review trial court’s application of law to facts, either in writing or on record at hearing); Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 784 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987); TEX. R. APP. P. 44.4. The trial court shall make the appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law and shall cause them to be filed with the trial court clerk within 20 days of the date of this order. We further order the trial court clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record with this Court within 30 days of the date of this order containing (1) the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law and (2) the motion to suppress filed by Nava on January 17, 2014. This appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket without further order of the Court when the supplemental clerk’s record is filed in this Court. It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland Acting individually Acting for the Court
Date: September 25, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Manuel Nava, Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/manuel-nava-jr-v-state-texapp-2014.